A Critique of Civilizing Rationality: Marginality Production Strategies

Authors

  • Carlos del Valle-Rojas UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28939/iam.debats.133-2.6

Abstract

The radical distinction between civilization and barbarism used in the discourse of the national states of Chile and Argentina during the second half of the XIX century, not only was used to justify the genocidal military intervention of
the territories inhabited by the mapuche indigenous from the south of both countries; but also inaugurated a conflictive relationship that remains to the present. The main objective of the paper is to identify the scope of the “civilization project”
initiated during the second part of the 19th century and expressed during the 20th and 21st centuries through different and broad forms of marginalization, both ethnic and -by extension- immigrant, the criminal and LGBT+ groups; in such a way that it is a historical, systematic and institutionalized process of producing marginalities, which considers various production strategies of the intimate enemy, especially from the cultural industry available in each time. The results show how “marginal/marginalized” is produced and reproduced, through policies of death, dispossession, inclusion/exclusion, in a constant relationship from moral, criminal and neoliberal rationalities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carlos del Valle-Rojas, UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA

Professor titular A, Universidad de La Frontera, Xile. Research Fellow, University of Groningen, Països Baixos. Doctor en comunicació, Universidad de Sevilla, Espanya. Postdoctorat del Programa Avançat de Cultura Contemporània, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Director del doctorat en comunicació i director de la revista Perspectivas de la comunicación, Universidad de La Frontera, Xile.

Published

2019-11-27

How to Cite

del Valle-Rojas, C. (2019) “A Critique of Civilizing Rationality: Marginality Production Strategies”, Debats. Journal on culture, power and society, 133(2). doi: 10.28939/iam.debats.133-2.6.

Issue

Section

SPECIAL ISSUE