The gender paradox: professionalisation of a form of traditional martial arts, Lathi Khela, in the sociocultural context of Bangladesh

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

Lathi Khela, gender, female body, woman, autoethnography, prestige, gender capital

Resumen

In the midst of a COVID-19 pandemic-struck India, this paper was born as an autoethnographic and analytical inquiry; it presents qualitative and multimodal research into a martial arts dance tradition, Lathi Khela, conducted from 2017 to 2018. This practice developed as a martial art, with little or no patronage, during the colonial days of the still undivided Bengal. Indeed, it still lives on as a popular martial arts dance tradition in many districts and rural communities of Bangladesh. Compared to other districts, the Lathi Khela group from Narail has continued this practice through innovative methods. The distinctive character of the district is governed by the multi-generational practitioners of Lathi Khela and their creative choreographies, as well as the knowledge it articulates and embodies. Moreover, in Narail, this previously male-dominated profession has also included women since 2008. The focus of this work was the role of gender in the continuity of the Lathi Khela tradition in this district. This was achieved
through five semi-structured, demonstrative interviews intuitively applied in the field. The research also drew on an ongoing conversation on Facebook with M. Rahat, an experienced Lathi Khela practitioner, who took stock of the current cultural landscape of the practice in the context of COVID-19. On the one hand, the women of this district occupy a contested space when representing this male-dominated tradition, and on the other, they physically embody lives within the patrilineal boundaries of kinship and marriage. The performativity of gender is thus, directly connected to the symbolic meaning of maan, that is, the prestige attributed to the female body within the sociocultural contexts of the Lathi Khela.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Sumedha Bhattacharyya, O.P. JINDAL GLOBAL UNIVERSITY

Sumedha is an interdisciplinary dance artist, scholar, researcher, educator, dance filmmaker, and primary caregiver based in India. She holds a full scholarship for her master’s degree in dance knowledge, practice, and heritage from the Erasmus Mundus program at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). Her research and teaching interests lie at the intersection of dance and cinema, performance, gender, and tradition. She has a graduate degree in liberal arts management from Ashoka University in India and is the founder of an evolving creative research lab, Duet with Camera, dedicated to sustaining the growing area of interdisciplinary practice, experimentation, and collaboration in dance and cinema.

Citas

Adhikary, S. (2015). The Bratachari Movement and the Invention of a ‘Folk Tradition’. South Asia: Journal of South

Asian Studies, 38(4), 656-670. DOI: 10.1080/00856401.2016.1086941

Ahmad, I. (2013). Industrial Relations and Labour Management of Bangladesh. USA & Canada: Trafford Publishing.

Bala S. (2013) The Entangled Vocabulary of Performance University of Amsterdam, Netherlands. Rupkatha Journal on

Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(2),12-21

Bharucha R.(1989). Notes on Invention of Tradition. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 24(33) 1907-1909+1911-1914

Bakka, E., and Karoblis, G. (2010). WRITING “A DANCE”: EPISTEMOLOGY FOR DANCE RESEARCH. International

Council for Traditional Music.

Bank, W. (2012). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012 Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1315936222006/

chapter-4.pdf. Accessed on 1st Dec 2017

Bhattacharyya, S. (2017) [Photograph of: Lathi Khela practitioners from different districts (Manikganj, Kishoreganj,Netrokona

group) in rural Bangladesh

Bhattacharyya, S. (2017) [Photograph of: Lathi Khela practitioners from Narail district of Bangladesh

Blanchet T. (1986). Marriage & Divorce in Bengali Muslim Society. unpublished, Dhaka.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. Oxford.

Boylorn, R.M. and Orbe, M.P. (Eds.). (2014). Critical Autoethnography: Intersecting Cultural Identities in Everyday

Life (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315431253

Bridges, T. S. (2009). Gender Capital and Male Boldy-Builders. Body & Society SAGE Publications , 15(1), 83–107.

Buckland, T. J. (2001). Dance, Authenticity and Cultural Memory: The Politics of Embodiment. International Council

for Traditional Music, 33, 6-16.

Butler J. (1990). Gender Trouble : Feminism and Subversion of Identity. New York : Routledge

Chandralekha. (1980). Militant Origins of Indian Dance. Social Scientist, Vol. 9,(2/3), 80-85. Retrieved 01 14, 2014

Chaudhary H, Rafiqul, A.R., Nilufer, 1980b. The Role of Women in the Social and Cultural Setting of Bangladesh :Some

Theoretical Understanding, in: Female Status In Bangladesh. Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies Dhaka,

Bangladesh, pp. 5–17.

Chowdhury, Najma. (2001). The Politics of Implementing Women’s Rights in Bangladesh, in: Globalisation, Gender

and Religion: The Politics of Women’s Rights in Catholic and Muslim Contexts. Palgrave, New York, 203–230.

Ellis, C., and Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K.

Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative research (pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Ettorre, E. (2017). Feminist Autoethnography, Gender, and Drug Use: “Feeling About” Empathy While “Storying the

I.” Contemporary Drug Problems, 44(4), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450917736160

Farrer, D.S., Whalen-Bridge, J. (2011). Martial Arts As Embodied Knowledge. State University of New York Press, Albany, United States

Giurchescu, A. (1999). Past and Present in Field Research. In T. Buckland, Dance in the Field: Methods and Research in

Dance Ethnography. Great Britain: Macmillian Press Ltd.

Hillyard, S., 2010. New Frontiers in Ethnography. s.l.: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Kabeer N. The Quest for National Identity: Women, Islam and the State in Bangladesh: Feminist Review,37, 38-58

Hossain, M. (2015). Women’s Participation in Agriculture in Bangladesh 1988-2008: Changes and Determinants.

ResearchGate, 1-17.

Huppatz, K. (2012). Gender Capital at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

Jones, D. E. (2002). Combat, ritual and Performance: Anthropology of the Martial Arts (2 ed.). Westport.

JUPress. (2017, August 30) https://jadunivpress.com/2017/08/30/astracharcha-pulin-behari-das-rachanasamgraha/

Kozinet, R. (2015). Netnography: Redefined.

Kozinets, R. V., Dolbec, P.-Y., and Earley, A. (2013). Netnographic Analysis: Understanding Culture Through Social.

In U. Flick, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis.

Kotalova, J. 1993, Belonging to others : cultural construction of womanhood among Muslims in a village in Bangladesh.

Academiae Ubsaliensis ; Distributor, Almqvist & Wiksell International Uppsala : Stockholm, Sweden

Lutz, H., Vivar, M.T.H., and Supik, L. (Eds.). (2011). Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-Faceted Concept

in Gender Studies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315582924

Mandakathingal A. (2020) Gender Roles in Martial Art: A Comparative Analysis of Kalaripayattu Practices in India:

Women’s Studies

Marium, L. (n.d.). Restructuring Traditions : An Experiment in introduction of Performance Pedagogy and Indigenous

Performing Art of Bangladesh. SAARC Folklore, (p. 9).

Marium L.(2021) Empowering communities through culture. (online) https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/news/

empowering-communities-through-culture-2052249. Accessed on 30th May 2021

Massey, D. B. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

McNay, L. (2000) Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press

Miller, D. L. (2014). Symbolic Capital and Gender: Evidence from two cultural fields. Sage, 1-21.

Munsi, U. S., and Burridge, S. (2011). Imag(in)ing the Nation: Uday Shankar’s Kalpana. In Traversing Tradition: Celebrating

Dance in India, New Delhi: Routledge, 124-150.

Ngunjiri, F. W., Hernandez, K. C., and Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research

[Editorial]. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), Article E1. Retrieved February 26, 2014, from http://jrp.icaap.org/

index.php/jrp/article/view/241/186

Turner, B., and Yangwen, Z. (2009). The Body in Asia, Asia Pacific Studies, 1-21

Department of Archaeology Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (2013). National Workshop on

Implementation of the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage in Bangladesh.

http://www.culture-developpement.asso.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Intangible-Cultural-Heritage-EN.pdf

White, S. C. (2010). Domains of contestation: Women’s empowerment and Islam in Bangladesh. Women’s Studies

International Forum, 1-11.

Wong, M.L. and Tiu-Wu, A. (2014). “Academic Sisterhood: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Two Asian Mothers,

Adult Educators, and Scholars,” Adult Education Research Conference

Wood, S. (2014). Nations, national identity and Prestige. National Identities, 99-115.

Publicado

2022-12-31

Cómo citar

Bhattacharyya, S. (2022) «The gender paradox: professionalisation of a form of traditional martial arts, Lathi Khela, in the sociocultural context of Bangladesh», Debats. Revista de cultura, poder y sociedad, 7, pp. 69–86. Disponible en: https://revistadebats.net/article/view/5510 (Accedido: 22 diciembre 2024).

Número

Sección

SPECIAL ISSUE 1