Creativity, humor and cognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28939/iam.debats-135-2.1Palabras clave:
linguistic humor, creative humor, incongruity-resolution, relevance theory.Resumen
In this paper we explore some aspects of the scientific study of creativity, by focusing on intentional attempts to create instances of linguistic humor. We argue that this sort of creativity can be accounted for within the framework of an influential cognitive approach, but this framework does not provide a recipe for producing novel instances of humor; in fact, it may even preclude humoristic effects. We start by identifying three great puzzles that arise in attempting to naturalize some core traits of creativity, and some ways they have been addressed by cognitive studies. We then consider what we call ‘creative humor’, which exhibits the core features of creativity previously identified. We then explore how an important (class of) cognitive approach(es) to human communication can account for creative humor. We conclude by drawing some morals and pointing out some limitations for cognitive approaches to creativity.
Descargas
Citas
Amir, O., and Biederman, I. (2016). The Neural Correlates of Humor Creativity. Front. Hum. Neurosci, 10, 597.
Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The Magic Synthesis. New York: Basic Books.
Beermann, U., and Ruch, W. (2009). How Virtuous is Humor? Evidence from Everyday Behavior. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(4), 395-417.
Bermúdez, J. (2014). Cognitive Science. An Introduction to the Science of Mind. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bermúdez, J. (2005). Philosophy of Psychology. A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Boden, M. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge.
Boden, M. (2009). Creativity: How Does It Work? In M. Krausz, D. Dutton and K. Bardsley (eds.), The Idea of Creativity (pp. 237-250). Leiden: Brill.
Boden, M. (2016). AI: Its Nature and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, N. (2014). Humour: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chan, Y-C., Chen, H-C., and Lavallee, J. (2013). The Impact of Gelotophobia, Gelotophilia and Katagelasticism on Creativity. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 26(4), 609-628.
Cropley, A. (2011). Definitions of Creativity. In M. Runco and S. Pritzker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed.) (pp. 511-524). San Diego: Academic Press.
Curcó, C. (1995). Some Observations on the Pragmatics of Humorous Interpretations: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 27-47.
Curcó, C. 1997b. The Pragmatics of Humorous Interpretations: A Relevance-Theoretic Account. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation. London: University College London.
Davies, G., and Subkoviak, M. (1975). Multidimensional Analysis of a Personality-Based Test of Creative Potential. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12(1), 37-43.
Dietrich, A., and Kanso, R. (2010). A Review of EEG, ERP, and Neuroimaging Studies of Creativity and Insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822-848.
Estany, A., and Herrera, R. (2016). Innovación en el saber teórico y práctico. London: College Publications.
Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think. Oxford: Basic Books.
Getzels, J., and Jackson, P. (1962). Creativity and Intelligence. New York: Wiley.
Gibson, J. (2019). An Introduction to the Psychology of Humor. New York: Routledge.
Gordon, W. (1962). Synectics. New York: Harper.
Hausman, C. (1979). Philosophy of Creativity. Ultimate Reality and Meaning, 2, 143-162.
Hausman, C. (1976). Introduction: The Creativity Question. In C. Hausman and A. Rothenberg, The Creativity Question (pp. 3-26). Durham: Duke University Press.
Hausman, C. (1984). A Discourse on Novelty and Creation. Albany: SUNY Press.
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Hong, N. (2010). Mow’em All Down Grandma: The “Weapon” of Humor in Two Danish World War II Occupation Scrapbooks. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(1), 27-64.
Howard-Jones, P., Blakemore, S., Samuel, E., Summers, I., and Claxton, G. (2005). Semantic Divergence and Creative Story Generation: An fMRI Investigation. Cogn. Brain Res., 25, 240-250.
Hurley, M., Dennett, D., and Adams, R. (2011). Inside Jokes: Using Humor to Reverse-Engineer the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jodłowiec, M. (1991). What Makes Jokes Tick? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 241-253.
Kivy, P. (2001). The Possessor and the Possessed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kellner, R., and Benedek, M. (2016). The Role of Creative Potential and Intelligence for Humor Production. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts. Advance online publication.
Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson.
Kronfeldner, M. (2009). Creativity Naturalized. The Philosophical Quarterly, 237(59), 577-592.
Limb, C., and Braun, A. (2008). Neural Substrates of Spontaneous Musical Performance: An fMRI Study of Jazz Improvisation. PLoS ONE, 2(3), e1679.
Mankoff, R. (2009). Foreword. In J. Morreall, Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor (pp. ix-x). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Maslow, A. (1971). The Father Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Viking Press.
Morreall, J. (2009). Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Murdock, M., and Ganim, R. (1993). Creativity and Humor: Integration and Incongruity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(27), 57-70.
O’Quin, K., and Derks, P. (2011) In M. Runco and S. Pritzker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed.) (p. 511-524). San Diego: Academic Press.
Papineau, D. (2006). Naturalist Theories of Meaning. In E. Lepore and B. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language (pp. 175-188). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rouff, L. (1975). Creativity and Sense of Humor. Psychological Reports, 37, 1022.
Scruton, R. (1982). Laughter. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 197-212.
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1987). Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 697-754.
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sprevak, M. (2016). Philosophy of the Psychological and Cognitive Sciences. In P. Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook for the Philosophy of Science (pp. 92-114). New York: Oxford University Press.
Stokes, D. (2007). Incubated Cognition and Creativity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 83-100.
Stokes, D., and Paul, E. (2016). Naturalistic Approaches to Creativity. In J. Sytsma and W. Buckwalter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy (pp. 318- 333). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Thagard, P., and Stewart, T. (2011). The AHA! Experience: Creativity Through Emergent Binding in Neural Networks. Cognitive Science, 35, 1-33.
Torrance, P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Princeton: Personnel Press.
Treadwell, Y. (1970). Humor and Creativity. Psychological Reports, 26, 55-58.
Wilson, D., and Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance Theory. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 607-632). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wyer, R., and Collins, J. (1992). A Theory of Humor Elicitation. Psychological Review, 99(4), 663-688.
Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yus, F. (2017). Relevance-Theoretic Treatments of Humor. In S. Attardo (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (pp. 189-203). New York: Routledge.
Ziv, A. (1976). Facilitating Effects of Humor on Creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 318-322.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Sin perjuicio de lo dispuesto en el artículo 52 de la Ley 22/1987 de 11 de noviembre de Propiedad Intelectual, BOE del 17 de noviembre de 1987, y conforme al mismo, los autores o autoras ceden a título gratuito sus derechos de edición, publicación, distribución y venta sobre el artículo, para que sea publicado en Debats. Revista de cultura, poder y sociedad.
Debats. Revista de cultura, poder y sociedad se publica bajo el sistema de licencias Creative Commons según la modalidad «Reconocimiento - NoComercial (by-nc): Se permite la generación de obras derivadas siempre que no se haga un uso comercial. Tampoco se puede utilizar la obra original con finalidades comerciales».
Así, cuando el autor o autora envía su colaboración, acepta explícitamente esta cesión de derechos de edición y de publicación. Igualmente autoriza a Debats. Revista de cultura, poder y sociedad, la inclusión de su trabajo en un fascículo de la revista para que se pueda distribuir y vender.