Social Revolt in Chile: A political counter-hegemony challenging the Neo-Liberal narrative?
Abstract
On the 18th of October 2019, Chile began undergoing the biggest political and social upheaval since
the one that ended the Pinochet dictatorship. This upheaval slowly gave way to a process of
impeachment of the traditional institutions of The State. This paper looks at the political
dimension of the ensuing social revolt and its scope in the Constituent itinerary agreed on the
15th of November 2019. It seeks to answer the question of whether the mass movement was the
expression of a political counter-hegemony challenging the Neo-Liberal order. To this end, it draws
on the main theoretical currents questioning the fit between democracy and Neo-Liberalism,
especially Chantal Mouffe's ‘antagonistic’ notion of ‘the populist moment’. In practical terms, it
analyses, on the basis of past political and electoral behaviour, two cleavages that tie in with
the emergence of the populist moment, that of elite/people and parties/ independents. From the
analysis of the electoral data covering the last thirty years and that bearing on the results of
the 2021 election of the members of the Constituent Convention, it is concluded that political
weariness is mirrored in the two cleavages defining the populist moment. Moreover, there was a
strengthening of the various political forces that saw themselves as anti-Neo-Liberal.
Downloads
References
Alvarado Espina, E. (2017). La calidad de la democracia en España y Chile. Un estudio a partir de
la desigualdad social y el elitismo político. PhD thesis. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de
Madrid.
Alvarado Espina, E. (2018). Una aproximación crítico-contextual al declive de la democracia en la
era neoliberal.
Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 47, 69-91.
Alvarado Espina, E., Morales Olivares, R. and Rivera Vargas, R. (2019). Radicalizar la democracia
desde los movimientos sociales. Los casos comparados de Podemos en España y del Frente Amplio en
Chile. Revista Izquierdas, 48, 87-105.
Bauman, Z. (2014). ¿La riqueza de unos pocos nos beneficia a todos? Barcelona: Paidós.
Boas, T. C., &Gans-Morse, J. (2009). Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal
slogan. Studies in comparative international development, 44(2), 137-161.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-009-9040-5
Dahl, R. (1997). Poliarquía. Participación y Oposición. Madrid: Alianza. Dahl, R. (2012). La
democracia. Barcelona: Ariel.
Deutsch, K. (1966). The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. New
York: Free Press. Encuesta Ciudadana (2019). Primer boletín de resultados (online).
https://www.achap.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/
Primeros-Resultados_Encuesta-Ciudadana25.10-1.pdf.
Foucault, M. (2012). El poder, una bestia magnífica. Buenos Aires: Siglo veintiuno.
Garretón, M. A. (2021). Del “Estallido” al Proceso Refundacional. El Nuevo Escenario de la Sociedad
Chilena.
Asian Journal of Latin American Studies, 34(2), 39-62.
Garretón, M. A. (2012). Las relaciones entre política y sociedad: Hacia una refundación. Mensaje,
(611), 6-10. Garrido-Vergara, L. (2020). Political, Social, and Cultural Capital in the Chilean
Political Elite, 1990–2010. Latin
American Politics and Society, 62(1), 121-141.
Harvey, D. (2007). Breve historia del neoliberalismo. Ediciones Akal.
Hayek, F. (1993). La desnacionalización del dinero. Madrid: Unión Editorial. Hermet, G. (2008). El
invierno de la democracia. Barcelona: Los libros del Lince
Huneeus, C., Lagos, M. and Díaz A. (2015). Los dos Chiles. Santiago de Chile: Catalonia.
Jörke, D. (2008). Post-democracia en Europa y América Latina. Revista de Sociología, (22). 141-156.
https://doi. org/10.5354/0719-529X.2008.14488
Keane, J. (1992). Democracia y sociedad civil. Alianza Editorial.
Leiva, B. A. (2020). Estallido social en Chile: la persistencia de la Constitución neoliberal como
problema. DPCE Online, 42(1), 2037-6677.
Madariaga, A. (2020). Neoliberal Resilience: Lessons in Democracy and Development from Latin
America and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mayol, A. (2019). Big bang. Estallido social 2019: Modelo derrumbado-sociedad rota-política inútil.
Editorial Catalonia. MORI (2020). Barómetro del trabajo enero (online).
https://cut.cl/cutchile/2020/01/24/barometro-del-trabajo-
mori-fiel-enero-2020-percepciones-y-expectativas-de-la-coyuntura-social-politica-economica-del-pais/
.
Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745-758.
Mouffe, Ch. (2012). La paradoja democrática. El peligro del consenso en la política contemporánea.
Barcelona: Gedisa. Mouffe, Ch. (16th June 2016). El momento populista. See:
https://elpais.com/elpais/2016/06/06/opinion/1465228236_594864.
html.
Mouffe, Ch. (2018). Por un populismo de izquierda. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
Nun, J. (2003). Democracy: Government of the People or Government of the Politicians? Rowman &
Littlefield.
Offe, C. (2014). The Europolis experiment and its lessons for deliberation on Europe. European
Union Politics, 15(3), 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116514532557
Schmitter, P. C. (2015). Crisis and transition, but not decline. Journal of Democracy, 26(1),
-44. doi:10.1353/ jod.2015.0004.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2011). Rethinking macroeconomics: What failed, and how to repair it. Journal of the European Economic
Association, 9(4), 591-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01030.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Without prejudice to the provisions of article 52 of Spanish Law 22/1987 of November 11 on Intellectual Property, BOE (official state bulletin) of November 17, 1987, and pursuant to said legislation, the author(s) surrender(s) free of charge its rights of edition, publication, distribution and sale of the article, for its publication in Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society.
Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society is published under the Creative Commons license system in accordance with the «Recognition - Non-Commercial (by-nc) modality: The generation of derivative works is permitted provided that commercial use is not made. Nor can the original work be used for commercial purposes».
Thus, when the author submits his/her contribution, he/she explicitly accepts this assignment of publishing and publishing rights. Authors also authorize Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society to include their work in an issue of the journal to be distributed and sold.