Enaction, Imagination, and Insight
Downloads
References
Alač, M. i Hutchins, E. (2004). I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal
of Cognition and Culture, 4(3), 629-661.
Bruner, J., Olver, R. i Greenfield, P., (ed.) (1966). Studies in cognitive growth: A collaboration at the Center for Cognitive
Studies. Nova York: John Wiley and Sons.
Churchland, P. S., Ramachandran, V. S. i Sejnowski, T. J. (1994). A critique of pure vision. En Koch, C. i Davis, J
(ed.), Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain, (p. 23–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cole, M. i Griffin, M. (1980). Cultural amplifiers reconsidered. En Olson, D. (ed.), The social foundations of language
and thought: Essays in honor of Jerome Bruner (p. 343–364). Nova York: Norton.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1-270.
Enfield, N. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. En Enfield, N. J. i Levinson, S. C. (ed.), Roots of human
sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (p. 399-430). Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Engel, A.K. (2010). Directive Minds: How dynamics shape cognition. En Stewart, J., Gappene, O. i DiPaolo, E. (ed.),
Enaction. Towards a New Paradigm in Cognitive Science. Nova York: Bradford Books.
Gentner, D. i Grudin, J. (1985). The evolution of mental metaphors in psychology: A 90-year retrospective. American
Psychologist, 40(2), 181-192.
Gibbs, R. (2006). Embodiment in cognitive science. Nova York: Cambridge University Press.
Glucksberg, S. (1964). Functional fixedness: Problem solution as a function of observing responses. Psychonomic
Science, 1, 117-118.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). Meeting other minds through gesture: How children use their hands to reinvent language
and distribute cognition. En Enfield, N. J. i Levinson, S. C. (ed.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and
interaction (p. 353-373). Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
Halbwachs, M. (1925). Les cadres sociaux de la memoire. París: Albin Michel.
Havelange, V., Lenay, C. i Stewart, J. (2003). Les representations: memoire externe et objets techniques. Intellectica,
, 115-131.
Holldobler, B. i Wilson, E. O. (2009). The superorganism: The beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. Nova
York: Norton.
Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
Hutchins, E. (2000). The cognitive consequences of patterns of information flow. Intellectica, 1(30), 53-74.
Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555-1577.
Hutchins, E. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. En Enfield, N. J. i Levinson, S. C.
(ed.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (p. 375-398). Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Hutchins, E. i Johnson, C. (2009). Modeling the emergence of language as an embodied collective cognitive activity.
Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 523-546.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling, and skill. Oxon, RU: Routledge.
Lakoff, G. i Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being.
Nova York: Basic Books.
Maturana, H. i Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, K. (2004). Imagination as joint activity: The case of architectural interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity,
(4), 267-278.
Myers, N. (2008). Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modeling in protein crystallography. Social Studies
of Science, 38(2), 163-199.
Noë. A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Norman, D. (1994). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Boston, Addison-
Wesley.
Núñez, R. (2005). Creating mathematical infinities: The beauty of transfinite cardinals. Journal of Pragmatics, 37,
-1741.
Núñez, R. i Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and
gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401-450.
O’Regan, J. K. i Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor approach to vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 224(5), 939-973.
Roberts, J. (1964). The self-management of cultures. En W. Goodenough (ed.), Explorations in cultural anthropology:
Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock (p. 433–454). Nova York, McGraw-Hill.
Seeley, T. i Levien, R. (1987). A colony of mind: the beehive as thinking machine. Sciences, 27(4), 38-43.
Smith, L. (2005). Action alters shape categories. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 665–679.
Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, C. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. Nova York, Doubleday.
Turner, J. S. (2000). The extended organism: The physiology of animal-built structures. Cambridge, MA, Harvard
University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Watson, J. (1968). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. Nova York, Simon and
Schuster.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Without prejudice to the provisions of article 52 of Spanish Law 22/1987 of November 11 on Intellectual Property, BOE (official state bulletin) of November 17, 1987, and pursuant to said legislation, the author(s) surrender(s) free of charge its rights of edition, publication, distribution and sale of the article, for its publication in Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society.
Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society is published under the Creative Commons license system in accordance with the «Recognition - Non-Commercial (by-nc) modality: The generation of derivative works is permitted provided that commercial use is not made. Nor can the original work be used for commercial purposes».
Thus, when the author submits his/her contribution, he/she explicitly accepts this assignment of publishing and publishing rights. Authors also authorize Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society to include their work in an issue of the journal to be distributed and sold.