The objectification of European Identity in the treaties and in European institutions’ declarations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28939/iam.debats-135-1.6Keywords:
European identity, European Union, nation, European constructionAbstract
In recent decades the concepts of “nation” and “territorial identity” have undergone a transformation in terms of politics and academia, with a shift from traditionally dominant ethno-cultural concepts to others of a political-civic nature. The former tend to define identity through objective elements (language, history, territory, culture, traditions, etc.) while the latter take a more subjective approach (basically, ‘the will to be’). In this paper, we delve into this transformation in the case of European
identity. To this end, we propose a qualitative and evolutionary approach that uses texts promoted by the EU (declarations and treaties), in which identity plays a relevant role. We carry out a content analysis that singles out those elements that have come to objectify the European identity (and, as a contrast, we look at those elements bearing on the identity of the Member States). While we identify an advance in the political-civil conception as a reflection of the general trend, culturally-oriented objective elements still remain in 21st Century texts. This reflects the need to publicly present an identity in construction as
something naturalised, and as part of a reality built through the ages. For Europe the concepts with greatest presence are “European identity” (more frequent in reports and brief declarations), “European culture” and “common European heritage” (more common in the treaties). These are concepts that, in some sense, reflect a given reality
Downloads
References
Balanyà, B., Doherty, A., Hoedeman, O., Ma’anit, A., Wesselius, E. (2002). Europa S.A. Barcelona: Icaria.
Bekemans, L. (2012). The idea of Europe: identity building from a historical perspective. L. Bekemans (Ed.), A value-driven European future (pp. 65-81). New York: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6233-9.
Billig, M. (2006). Nacionalisme banal. Catarroja: Afers-Universitat de València.
Carr, K. (2015). Regulating the periphery – shaking the core. European Universtiy Institute Working Papers, 40, 28 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2728671.
Clerc, L. (2014). European identity: the past and the present. M. Holmberg and H-P. Ikäheimo (Eds.), Narratives of Europe (pp. 7-13). Tallin: Eurooppalainen Suomi ry.
Delanty, G. (2003). Is there a European identity? Global Dialogue, 5(3-4).
ETCD-European Task Force on Culture and Development (1997). In from the margins. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Etxezarreta, M. (2008). La evolución (perversa) de la política social de la Unión Europea. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política, 31, 123-138.
European Commission (2012). The development of european identity/identities: unfinished business. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (1992). Tratado de la Unión Europea. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (1973). Declaration on European Identity. Bulletin of the European Communities, 12, 118-122.
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca (NY, US): Cornell University Press.
Ferreira, G. B. (2009). What identity for Europe? Social Science Tribune, 14(55), 13-28.
Fligstein, N. (2009). Euro-clash. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580859.001.0001.
Fligstein, N., Polyakova, A., Sandholtz, W. (2012). European integration, nationalism and European identity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(51), 106-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02230.x.
Friese, H. (2004). La otredad de Europa. Política y Sociedad, 41(3), 99-112.
Gattermann, K., Högenauer, A.-L., Huff, A. (2016). Studying a new phase of europeanisation of national parliaments. European Political Science, 15(1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.56.
Granja, D. M., and Charpenel, E. (2014). El ideal de la paz perpetua en Rousseau y Kant. Signos Filosóficos, 16(31). https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v65n162.59715.
Guth, J. L., and Nelsen, B.F. (2014). Religion in the creation of European and national identities. Oxford Symposium on Religious Studies at the University. Church of St. Mary. December.
Habermas, J. (1996). The European Nation State. Ratio Juris, 9(2), 125-137.
Hernández, J., and Ramiro, P. (2016). Contra la lex mercatoria. Barcelona: Icaria.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Naciones y nacionalismo desde 1780. Barcelona: Crítica.
Hobsbawm, E. J., and Ranger, T. (Comps) (1988). L’invent de la tradició. Vic: Eumo.
Hopkins, D. J., and King, G. (2010). A method of automated nonparametric content analysis for social science. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00428.x.
Hroch, M. (1996). From national movement to the fully-formed nation. G. Balakrishnan (Ed.), Mapping the nation (pp. 78-97). London: Verso.
Innerarity, D. (2013). The political innovation of the European Union. Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 48, 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72197-2_7.
Innerarity, C., and Acha, B. (2010). Los discursos sobre ciudadanía e inmigración en Europa. Política y Sociedad, 47(2), 63-84.
Jansen, T. (ed.) (1999). Reflections on European identity. Brussels: European Commission.
Kaelberer, M. (2004). The Euro and European Identity. Review of International Studies, 30, 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210504005996.
Kantner, C. (2006). Collective identity as shared ethical self-understanding. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(4), 501-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006073016.
Karlsson, I. (1999). How to define the European identity today and in the future? T. Jansen (Ed.), Reflections on European identity (pp. 63-72). Brussels: European Commission.
Keating, A. (2009). Educating Europe’s citizens. Citizenship Studies, 13(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020902731140.
López Facal, R. (2010). Nacionalismos y europeísmos en los libros de texto. La Historia Enseñada, 14, 9-30. https://doi.org/10.14409/cya.v1i14.1673.
McDonald, M. (1999). European identity - an anthropoligical approach. T. Jansen (Ed.), Reflections on European identity (pp. 77-80). Brussels: European Commission.
Moes, J. (2008). European identity compared. ECPR 4th Pan-European Conference on EU-Politics, 25-27, 23 pp.
Paradés, M. (2013). La identidad española y la identidad europea en el apoyo a la Unión Europea. XIº Congreso Español de Sociología, july. FES, Madrid.
Popa, M-C. (2016). Algunas reflexiones sobre el análisis del proyecto europeo como espacio discursivo. Espéculo, 56, 9-16.
Přibáň, J. (2009). The juridification of European identity. Constellations, 16(1), 44-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00520.x.
Recchi, E., and Salamońska, J. (2014). Keeping the European faith. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 7(3), 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v7i3p509.
Smith, A. D. (2004). Nacionalismo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Trausch, G. (1999). Consciousness of European identity after 1945. T. Jansen (Ed.), Reflections on European identity (pp. 21-26). Brussels: European Commission.
Tsaliki, L. (2007). The construction of European identity and citizenship through cultural policy. European Studies, 24, 157-182. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204156_010.
Waldschmidt, A. (2009). Disability policy of the European Union: the supranational level. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research, 3, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2008.12.002.
Wisniewski, E. (2013). The influence of the European Parliament on the European External Action Service. European Foreign Affairs Review, 18(1), 81-102.
Wodak, R., and Boukala, S. (2015). European identities and the revival of nationalism in the EU. Journal of Language and Politics, 143, 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Without prejudice to the provisions of article 52 of Spanish Law 22/1987 of November 11 on Intellectual Property, BOE (official state bulletin) of November 17, 1987, and pursuant to said legislation, the author(s) surrender(s) free of charge its rights of edition, publication, distribution and sale of the article, for its publication in Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society.
Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society is published under the Creative Commons license system in accordance with the «Recognition - Non-Commercial (by-nc) modality: The generation of derivative works is permitted provided that commercial use is not made. Nor can the original work be used for commercial purposes».
Thus, when the author submits his/her contribution, he/she explicitly accepts this assignment of publishing and publishing rights. Authors also authorize Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society to include their work in an issue of the journal to be distributed and sold.
