Expert‑panel accreditation evaluation‑practices: an autoethnographic case study of the Community of Madrid

Authors

  • Juan Arturo Rubio Arostegui UNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO DE NEBRIJA/UNIVERSIDAD DE VALENCIA

Abstract

Accreditation is defined by the European Higher Education Area quality‑assurance agencies as a key element in quality management and continuous improvement in university teaching‑learning processes, and is an institutional practice that started to be developed in 2014 in Spain. This article illustrates the case of the Community of Madrid Quality Agency, as case study analysis through my experience as a panel member for the accreditation of higher‑education qualifications. Methodologically, it is based on an autoethnographic approach and uses the theory of symbolic interactionism to reveal and analyse the evaluative process and culture. For this purpose, two analytical axes were drawn: student learning‑outcomes and the value of the human resources assigned to the degree in terms of their academic research, both criteria which the quality agencies consider to be critical for a favourable final report. The interactions of the expert panel at the different stages of the accreditation consideration‑process, based on these two criteria, are presented with the aim that future case studies will test them in the context of collaborative learning, helping to achieve the greatest possible academic rigor in the accreditation process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan Arturo Rubio Arostegui, UNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO DE NEBRIJA/UNIVERSIDAD DE VALENCIA

Juan Arturo Rubio Arostegui is a senior professor in Philosophy and Education Sciences. He has a Master’s degree in Cultural Management and has a doctorate in Political Science and Sociology from Universidad Complutense, Madrid. He has taught in the fields of cultural management and educational and cultural policy at the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos since 2002 and at the Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, since 2009. He is the main resercher of the group Comunidades académicas y artísticas (Artistic and Academic Communities) at the same university and he is also director of its Doctorate School. He is also a member of the Centre d’Estudis sobre Cultura, Poder i Identitats (Center for the Study of Culture, Power and Identity), at the Universitat de València.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-19

How to Cite

Rubio Arostegui, J. A. (2017) “Expert‑panel accreditation evaluation‑practices: an autoethnographic case study of the Community of Madrid”, Debats. Journal on culture, power and society, 2. Available at: https://revistadebats.net/article/view/1724 (Accessed: 22 December 2024).

Issue

Vol. 2 (2017): Annual Review 2

Section

SPECIAL ISSUE 2

License

Without prejudice to the provisions of article 52 of Spanish Law 22/1987 of November 11 on Intellectual Property, BOE (official state bulletin) of November 17, 1987, and pursuant to said legislation, the author(s) surrender(s) free of charge its rights of edition, publication, distribution and sale of the article, for its publication in Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society.

Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society is published under the Creative Commons license system in accordance with the «Recognition - Non-Commercial (by-nc) modality: The generation of derivative works is permitted provided that commercial use is not made. Nor can the original work be used for commercial purposes».

Thus, when the author submits his/her contribution, he/she explicitly accepts this assignment of publishing and publishing rights. Authors also authorize Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society to include their work in an issue of the journal to be distributed and sold.